ramblings

Wikiality: Where Truthiness Reigns

Posted on

Stephen Corbert has his own version of Wikipedia up now called Wikiality, a site dedicated to upholding and documenting truthiness. It does a great job mimicing Wikipedia, almost as good of a job as I did mimicing the NY Times with The Poser.
One entry that is particularly funny is about Steagle Colbeagle the Eagle, the mascot of the Saginaw Spirit, a minor league hockey team in Michigan. It seems that they were having a contest to rename the mascot and enough people suggested that they name it after Colbert that the Stephen inspired name won. Now, the team has fully embraced the new name and I’m thoroughly amused to say the least.
Read through the rest of the site to truly understand why our country is screwed.
Via Janelle

television

Tables Turned

Posted on

You can’t make this stuff up: Dog the Bounty hunter was just captured in his own home by bounty hunters and is being sent to Mexico to answer an unlawful imprisionment charge he picked up when in 2003 he captured an American, who happened to have raped 3 women in America, in Mexico. They caught the whole capture on film as A&E is busy taping the 4th Dog season and they are airing it tomorrow night in a special. This one I have to watch!
After the jump, read a long article about it and Duane Chapman, aka Dog.
A Cornered Pit Bull: Bounty Hunter Becomes Prey by David Carr
The eight or so men crept quietly up to the house in the Portlock neighborhood of Hawaii at the crack of dawn. The woman inside was making school lunches for her children and noticed them too late. They bum-rushed the bedroom, capturing their target in cuffs before he knew what hit him.
Duane Chapman, known as Dog, the premier American bounty hunter, would have appreciated their artistry had he not been the guy in handcuffs. Mr. Chapman, the star of A&E’s highly rated “Dog the Bounty Hunter,” was transported to the federal detention center in Honolulu to await extradition to Mexico on a three-year-old charge stemming from his capture in Mexico of Andrew Luster, the Max Factor heir who was eventually convicted of raping three women.
Back in 2003 Mr. Chapman and his colleagues were charged by Mexican authorities with “deprivation of liberty” and held in jail in Puerto Vallarta before they made bail and slipped out of the country. Now, with less than a month before the warrant would have expired and in the midst of filming the fourth season of his enormously successful reality series, Mr. Chapman was the one being brought to justice. (Yesterday the Chapman family suggested that some horse trading was under way, pointing out that Francisco Rafael Arellano Félix, part of a Mexican drug cartel, was handed over to United States authorities.)
As American symbols go, Mr. Chapman is a pretty epic one. He has had 4 wives, 12 children, 18 robbery convictions, a conviction for being an accessory to murder, and, according to his math, more than 7,000 fugitives brought to justice. He belonged to a biker gang, but cries easily and enjoys vacuuming. His show, filmed mostly in Hawaii, is a mix of tweaking meth-heads and postarrest moralism, a business built on repossessing human flesh. But with Mr. Chapman, the drama always seems to continue after the cameras shut off. On the day he was to be married this spring in a filmed ceremony, his estranged daughter died. And now this.
“He leads a complicated, edgy life,” said Lucas Platt, the supervising producer of the show. “Going after Andrew Luster was a risky decision, but he thought it was the right thing to do. Now it has taken an unfortunate turn.” The turn won’t hurt ratings. A&E plans a special for tomorrow night, and the stories about his travails will only add to the legend. The man who brought vengeance to thousands of bail jumpers found himself on the wrong end of justice.
“I was totally freaked out,” Mr. Chapman said on the phone Saturday after he had posted a $300,000 bail to await a hearing on extradition. “There were guys that I had put in there that were yelling all sorts of things at me.”
His wife Beth, a co-star in the series, worked frantically for his release.
The 2003 Luster arrest, which catapulted Mr. Chapman to a new level of celebrity and eventually resulted in A&E signing him for the series, led to a lasting grudge on the part of Mexican authorities, who demanded that the United States extradite the bounty hunter.
On Thursday night the Mexican attorney general released a statement suggesting that what Mr. Chapman had done was an affront to national sovereignty.
Larry Butrick, chief of the criminal division for the United States Attorney’s Office in Honolulu, said that his staff was merely executing a valid warrant that came from headquarters in Washington.
“The court here really will just be looking at the legality of the extradition and if there is a fit under the treaty we have with Mexico,” he said.
One of Mr. Chapman’s lawyers is hoping that the matter can be settled somewhere short of a Mexican prison.
“I have a high level of confidence that we will be able work with the good will and good faith of the Mexican authorities in resolving this satisfactorily,” said William C. Bollard, who represents Mr. Chapman, his son Leland and Tim Chapman (no relation), a bounty-hunting colleague, all of whom helped apprehend Mr. Luster. For now the Dog is at large, albeit with an ankle bracelet.
“If I have a fugitive on the run and have to go out at night, I have to notify them,” he said, referring to federal officials. “I have no problem with that.”
In the month before his arrest, Mr. Chapman was busy hunting jumpers for the benefit for those who posted bond, and for a nimble A&E camera crew that jogged after them. The show’s template is simple and effective: The quarry is selected, a plan is made among the family members who make up most of his crew, the hunt commences and then capture, usually followed by a hug at the end, although a handcuffed one.
A bad guy made good by an 18-month stint in prison on the accessory-to-murder charge, Mr. Chapman sees an arrest as a kind of intervention, a way to let the runner face the music and begin a new life.
“We put families back together,” he explained, even though they often do that by putting one of the heads of the household behind bars. It has been wildly popular — “Dog the Bounty Hunter” is A&E’s most-watched show — partly because his mix of mayhem and moralizing has a kind of outlaw sweetness. It is a bit of Ward Cleaver, though accompanied by multiple cans of Mace, just in case.
On television, or in person during a recent visit by a reporter to Mr. Chapman’s headquarters in Hawaii, the hunt is a spectacle to behold. On a hot day near the end of August, Mr. Chapman laid out the agenda for the day. Item first and last: putting bond jumper Monalisa Hartsock in cuffs.
“She has the letter R tattooed on her left breast,” Dog told his colleagues at Da Kine Bail Bonds, which he and his wife own on Queen Emma Street in Honolulu. Speaking from behind major sunglasses that play MP3’s including “I Fought the Law” and thumping an ornate American Indian walking stick for emphasis, Dog warned that Ms. Hartsock was one of the many island inhabitants who got lost in smokable meth: “She knows she is going to jail.” The lowdown on Ms. Hartsock is followed by a shout-out to Jesus, who always rides point on any hunt.
Hawaii is a near-perfect ecosystem for bounty hunting. It is a rock, after all, thousands of miles out in the ocean, so a person can hide in only so many places. Meth has overtaken the island, so there is no shortage of bail-jumping, tweaky perps. Dog crossed over after his prison time, but just barely, still working the corners of the law to substantial effect. The rest of his crew could not be cast any better: Beth, a large sexpot with brutal intelligence and an oft-hidden heart of gold; Tim, the wizened sensei who works himself into a quiet rage; Duane Lee, the normal guy with abnormal biceps who loves taking down bad guys; Leland, the wayward son swaddled in tattoos and mail from adoring fans, and “Baby” Lisa, the up-and-coming toughie.
Mr. Chapman sees himself as a fisher of men, an enforcer who brings people to justice in what he calls “the cuffs of love.” He first turned it around as the No. 1 Kirby vacuum cleaner salesman in the country during the early 1970’s and now has taken his dust-busting ways to cleaning up the culture at large.
In a single episode he works the gutters for data, deploys phony accents and white lies on the phone, and physically tracks a runner in a way that seems a bit supernatural. It helps that most crooks are dumb as a box of rocks, but still.
The name Monalisa has Beth Chapman humming the song recorded by Nat King Cole. She has a lovely voice, albeit paired with a top-heavy endowment that borders on the architectural and a tendency to go junkyard dog when cornered. All honey for the time being, she convinces one of Monalisa’s pals who posted bail to help them find her.
Beth gently explained to Desiree that while it is hard to give up a pal, “the alternative is you have to pay the bond.” A call finally went through to Monalisa: Desiree convinced her to meet at a 76 gas station. The trap is set.
Right on schedule, Monalisa pulled in. “That’s her,” Desiree said. But Beth’s car was momentarily blocked in by Tim’s so she could not come around the other side; Monalisa saw Dog — tough to miss in his stunt mullet— hop out of Tim’s car, and she began backing up. Leland flew out of Beth’s car and filled the fleeing car with Mace, as did Duane Lee, but Monalisa tore out in reverse and careened through an intersection toward the highway, cars squealing to avoid her. Beth, in hot pursuit, filled the car with expletives : “Of all the rookie moves in the world!” she said. She fruitlessly crisscrosses the nearby neighborhood at high speed, while the car driven by Tim does the same. Mistakes were made. (Monalisa was finally captured by Dog and company early this month.)
Dog freely admits later to messing up Monalisa’s capture. He pleads guilty as well and to rolling around in his 15 minutes. “I always wanted to be the good guy in the black hat,” he said.
Despite the success of his show, his team had to scrape together money to bail him. Each member of the crew has a hard-knock history, no one assuming they deserve or can depend on success. They may have gone Hollywood, but their trashy roots are never painted over with peroxide.
By definition, anybody Mr. Chapman catches is having a bad day, but when the chase is over, Dog always gives them a cigarette and The Talk, an echo of a life-changing discussion he had with a deputy who was taking him to jail so many years ago.
Earlier that same week in August the hunting was more fruitful. After looking all over Oahu, they found Jacob Falenofoa, another meth casualty, with the help of his wife, who co-signed the bond. They found him at the house of a girlfriend’s parents in Pearl City. Riding back on H1, a highway that heads back to Honolulu, Dog went all biblical on Jacob, talking about how the drugs he was doing “ate his brain” and how deep down he was a good family man. This being Hawaii, a rainbow bloomed to the north as the speech peaked.
Dog said he was happy with the day’s outcome.
“I believe in what I do, I am good at what I do, and I want to be able to say that Jesus played a role in it,” he said. “Never, ever, has anyone ever escaped.”
Not even Dog. A few short weeks later, the cuffs of love found Mr. Chapman.

television

Dork Jeopardy

Posted on

I was watching Jeopardy’s “Tournament of Champions” tonight and when Alex introduced the first 6 categories at the start of the show I just laughed at the sheer magnitude of the dork factor:

  • Star Trek, Star Wars or Lord of the Rings
  • Action Figures
  • Dinner for one
  • In need of a date
  • Still living with “Mom” and “Dad”
  • You have no life

The writers must have had a field day!
In honor of this great night for geeks, here are the 5 questions in the first category:

  • $200: A council that takes place at Rivendell is central to its plot
  • $400: In its lore, a Bagoran wormhole leads to the Gamma Quadrant
  • $600: This one lent its name to a defensive weapons system that many felt was a pie-in-the-sky fantasy
  • $800: A race called the Andorans causes trouble for the humans in this one
  • $1000: Its creator was born in South Africa

If you don’t know the answers, check it out after the jump

  • $200: LOTR
  • $400: ST
  • $600: SW
  • $800: ST
  • $1000: LOTR
television

Good TV

Posted on

I recently donated money to PBS and provided the operator who took my call with my email addresses. Now I receive weekly “This Week on Thirteen” email updates. Too often one only hears about what the broadcast and cable networks are doing, specifically about the relative dreck that they are airing on a daily basis. Although most people haven’t watched public television since they watched “Seasame Street,” the following three programs will probably make you realize that watching TV does not need to merely be an escape but that it can be educational and rewarding as well. Any program that features Salman Rushdie asking the question “What kind of a god is it that’s upset by a cartoon in Danish?” is something that I’ve got to watch!
Tuesday, June 20 at 9pm
Frontline: The Dark Side
Frontline examines the conflicts within the U.S. government regarding the war on terror, much of which is fought by the CIA and other intelligence agencies on what Vice President Cheney has called “The Dark Side.”
Thursday, June 22 at 8pm

Monarchy with David Starkey: The Early Kings
David Starkey hosts this series chronicling the power, politics, religion, and extraordinary lives of the English Crown. (Part 1 of 6)
Friday, June 23 at 9pm

Bill Moyers On Faith and Reason: Salman Rushdie
“What kind of a god is it that’s upset by a cartoon in Danish?” asks Salman Rushdie in the premiere episode of Bill Moyers’ new series. Moyers’ conversation with Rushdie illuminates the importance of the freedom of belief in what some are calling an era of intolerance. Repeats Sun, June 25 at 7pm. (Part 1 of 7)

movies

Happy Friday Star Wars Edition!

Posted on

I saw this scene where Darth Vader has to break the Death Star destruction news to the Emperor the other week on Robot Chicken and found it hilarious. Today, it showed up on Chris’s site. I didn’t realize that there was a clip of it at YouTube but I should have. I swear, You Tube is getting to be almost eBay-esque. The same way that one automatically assumes a product, no matter what kind, is available on eBay (Snoopy Sno-cone maker perchance?), now one should start to assume that a clip of whatever he/she wants will be on You Tube. As for Robot Chicken, that show is seriously going to carry my Sunday nights after the Sopranos bow off because something good on TV has to ease me back into the working week. Enjoy!

Via Chris

politics

Christian Politics

Posted on

Garry Wills, professor emeritus of history at Northwestern University and the author, most recently, of “What Jesus Meant,” wrote a great op-ed piece in today’s NY Times titled “Christ Among the Partisans.” Long story short, he goes point for point on how Jesus would not be happy with the way that Republicans, and maybe soon Democrats as they try to play catch-up, are perverting his teachings for their own moralistic and political ends. For instance:
>> [Jesus] avoided those who would trap him into taking sides for or against the Roman occupation of Judea. He paid his taxes to the occupying power but said only, “Let Caesar have what belongs to him, and God have what belongs to him” (Matthew 22:21). He was the original proponent of a separation of church and state.
>> Those who want the state to engage in public worship, or even to have prayer in schools, are defying his injunction: “When you pray, be not like the pretenders, who prefer to pray in the synagogues and in the public square, in the sight of others. In truth I tell you, that is all the profit they will have. But you, when you pray, go into your inner chamber and, locking the door, pray there in hiding to your Father, and your Father who sees you in hiding will reward you” (Matthew 6:5-6). He shocked people by his repeated violation of the external holiness code of his time, emphasizing that his religion was an internal matter of the heart.
The first thing I thought of when I read this was the Amazing Race of all things. On the Amazing Race Family Edition (last season’s incarnation of the show), one team extolled their “Christian values” at every chance they got and felt that when no one liked them, they are being persecuted for being the only “Christian” team. The obvious answer of “you are so damn annoying!” obviously didn’t get through their thick Christ loving skulls. Aside from praising Jesus anytime something went their way or praying to Jesus to help them complete challenges, they were probably the most un-Christian team in race primarily due to their poor sportsmanship and bad behavior. Their utter hypocracy bothered me to no end. They surely weren’t exhibiting Christ-like values when they sped by other teams on the highway and chucked food at their cars or when they insulted and mocked other teams or when they plotted their vengence on teams that “hurt” their chances. Where was the lovingkindness that Christ preached? When players thank Jesus at the end of a basketball game, I go crazy. I mean, the nerve to think that Jesus had nothing better to do than to sit around and ensure that your buzzer beater went in. He frankly doesn’t care. By the way, the same player praising Jesus’s love for his jumpshot will obviously think that Jesus isn’t paying attention to him when he is blowing lines with a hooker later back at the team hotel.
Unfortunately, being a good Christian to many in America simply means, “Jesus loves me, I’m going to heaven and I can do whatever the hell I want until then, which includes actingly like a total and utter prick, because I go to Church each week.” I’ve seen this in politics. I’ve seen this in the intolerance shown towards certain segments of the US population and when people vote against their own interests based on politicians playing on their moral fears. I even saw this on the Amazing Race. It all comes back to the fact that more people have been killed in the name of religion than for any other reason. America was founded on the principal of tolerance for all and unfortunately, religion when used incorrectly, breeds intolerance and hate, the old “My God can kick your God’s ass.” Don’t even get me started on how this relates to terrorism in its present fundamentalist incarnation. We’ll save that for another post.
The article itself is very interesting and shows how the true nature of WWJD is not being applied by those that say that they are exhibiting Christ-like values. Christ preached lovingkindness, tolerance and support for all. He didn’t preach the intolerance that many in the Moral Majority lovingly exhibit. As for the op-ed piece, I’ve grabbed it and put it after the jump for those that find this post after the NY Times archives it because I think its important for all to read it.
April 9, 2006
Christ Among the Partisans By Garry Wills (Op-Ed Contributor), Chicago
There is no such thing as a “Christian politics.” If it is a politics, it cannot be Christian. Jesus told Pilate: “My reign is not of this present order. If my reign were of this present order, my supporters would have fought against my being turned over to the Jews. But my reign is not here” (John 18:36). Jesus brought no political message or program.
This is a truth that needs emphasis at a time when some Democrats, fearing that the Republicans have advanced over them by the use of religion, want to respond with a claim that Jesus is really on their side. He is not. He avoided those who would trap him into taking sides for or against the Roman occupation of Judea. He paid his taxes to the occupying power but said only, “Let Caesar have what belongs to him, and God have what belongs to him” (Matthew 22:21). He was the original proponent of a separation of church and state.
Those who want the state to engage in public worship, or even to have prayer in schools, are defying his injunction: “When you pray, be not like the pretenders, who prefer to pray in the synagogues and in the public square, in the sight of others. In truth I tell you, that is all the profit they will have. But you, when you pray, go into your inner chamber and, locking the door, pray there in hiding to your Father, and your Father who sees you in hiding will reward you” (Matthew 6:5-6). He shocked people by his repeated violation of the external holiness code of his time, emphasizing that his religion was an internal matter of the heart.
But doesn’t Jesus say to care for the poor? Repeatedly and insistently, but what he says goes far beyond politics and is of a different order. He declares that only one test will determine who will come into his reign: whether one has treated the poor, the hungry, the homeless and the imprisoned as one would Jesus himself. “Whenever you did these things to the lowliest of my brothers, you were doing it to me” (Matthew 25:40). No government can propose that as its program. Theocracy itself never went so far, nor could it.
The state cannot indulge in self-sacrifice. If it is to treat the poor well, it must do so on grounds of justice, appealing to arguments that will convince people who are not followers of Jesus or of any other religion. The norms of justice will fall short of the demands of love that Jesus imposes. A Christian may adopt just political measures from his or her own motive of love, but that is not the argument that will define justice for state purposes.
To claim that the state’s burden of justice, which falls short of the supreme test Jesus imposes, is actually what he wills — that would be to substitute some lesser and false religion for what Jesus brought from the Father. Of course, Christians who do not meet the lower standard of state justice to the poor will, a fortiori, fail to pass the higher test.
The Romans did not believe Jesus when he said he had no political ambitions. That is why the soldiers mocked him as a failed king, giving him a robe and scepter and bowing in fake obedience (John 19:1-3). Those who today say that they are creating or following a “Christian politics” continue the work of those soldiers, disregarding the words of Jesus that his reign is not of this order.
Some people want to display and honor the Ten Commandments as a political commitment enjoined by the religion of Jesus. That very act is a violation of the First and Second Commandments. By erecting a false religion — imposing a reign of Jesus in this order — they are worshiping a false god. They commit idolatry. They also take the Lord’s name in vain.
Some may think that removing Jesus from politics would mean removing morality from politics. They think we would all be better off if we took up the slogan “What would Jesus do?”
That is not a question his disciples ask in the Gospels. They never knew what Jesus was going to do next. He could round on Peter and call him “Satan.” He could refuse to receive his mother when she asked to see him. He might tell his followers that they are unworthy of him if they do not hate their mother and their father. He might kill pigs by the hundreds. He might whip people out of church precincts.
The Jesus of the Gospels is not a great ethical teacher like Socrates, our leading humanitarian. He is an apocalyptic figure who steps outside the boundaries of normal morality to signal that the Father’s judgment is breaking into history. His miracles were not acts of charity but eschatological signs — accepting the unclean, promising heavenly rewards, making last things first.
He is more a higher Nietzsche, beyond good and evil, than a higher Socrates. No politician is going to tell the lustful that they must pluck out their right eye. We cannot do what Jesus would do because we are not divine.
It was blasphemous to say, as the deputy under secretary of defense, Lt. Gen. William Boykin, repeatedly did, that God made George Bush president in 2000, when a majority of Americans did not vote for him. It would not remove the blasphemy for Democrats to imply that God wants Bush not to be president. Jesus should not be recruited as a campaign aide. To trivialize the mystery of Jesus is not to serve the Gospels.
The Gospels are scary, dark and demanding. It is not surprising that people want to tame them, dilute them, make them into generic encouragements to be loving and peaceful and fair. If that is all they are, then we may as well make Socrates our redeemer.
It is true that the tamed Gospels can be put to humanitarian purposes, and religious institutions have long done this, in defiance of what Jesus said in the Gospels.
Jesus was the victim of every institutional authority in his life and death. He said: “Do not be called Rabbi, since you have only one teacher, and you are all brothers. And call no one on earth your father, since you have only one Father, the one in heaven. And do not be called leaders, since you have only one leader, the Messiah” (Matthew 23:8-10).
If Democrats want to fight Republicans for the support of an institutional Jesus, they will have to give up the person who said those words. They will have to turn away from what Flannery O’Connor described as “the bleeding stinking mad shadow of Jesus” and “a wild ragged figure” who flits “from tree to tree in the back” of the mind.
He was never that thing that all politicians wish to be esteemed — respectable. At various times in the Gospels, Jesus is called a devil, the devil’s agent, irreligious, unclean, a mocker of Jewish law, a drunkard, a glutton, a promoter of immorality.
The institutional Jesus of the Republicans has no similarity to the Gospel figure. Neither will any institutional Jesus of the Democrats.
Garry Wills is professor emeritus of history at Northwestern University and the author, most recently, of “What Jesus Meant.”

ramblings

The Gift

Posted on

SCI FI Channel is currently conducting the first-ever nationwide search for America’s most talented new psychic. Eight finalists will be selected by a panel of experts to compete on SCI FI’s new original reality series The Gift, slated to premiere this summer.
First of all, I can’t wait to see what these experts look like. Second and more important, if you are a psychic, then how do you not know you won already? I would love to see 8 people besieging the producer saying “Of course I won! I’m psychic! Dismiss these pretenders immediately!”
Via Monty

politics

Why Not To Vote For Vernon Robinson For U.S. Congress

Posted on

Having helped run a congressional campaign, I would never have allowed this Twilight Zone commercial to run but it did and boy did it kick up some controversy. It is so bigoted its almost funny as Vernon Robinson is “unabashedly and unalterably opposed to racial quotas, special rights for homosexuals, the United Nations, the proliferation of frivolous lawsuits, women in combat, pork barrel spending, useless government programs and agencies, onerous regulations, and all tax hikes.” He’s a Republican. Couldn’t you guess?
Speaking of “The Twilight Zone,” after the jump read an interesting article about its creator, Mr. Rod Serling, and Binghamton, a city I hold near and dear to my heart.
Via Moeller
Our Towns; Submitted for Your Approval, a Homecoming
By PETER APPLEBOME (NYT) 921 words
Published: February 26, 2006
Binghamton, N.Y. – CONSIDER, if you will, one Rodman Edward Serling, a fortunate boy from a fortunate town, who grew up in a rambling stucco house a short walk from Recreation Park, where the music from the carousel wafted through the air every summer evening. It all seemed so perfect, as if it would last forever. Only, somehow, things took an odd detour, and then another — until he ended up instead in a place of shadows and smoke, a place we know as the Twilight Zone.
Or so might the opener go if Rod Serling ever did a ”Twilight Zone” episode on Rod Serling. But, then, as people in Binghamton know, he often did, returning time and again to the sights and sounds of his childhood as if coming back for something he had left behind.
So it’s not surprising that 31 years after his death, there’s a movement afoot to build a Rod Serling Museum in an old Victorian house on Main Street. It’s also not surprising that on April 21 and 22, Ithaca College, where he once taught, will offer what’s billed as the first academic conference on Serling’s work.
What is surprising is that it feels not so much like a memorial to a man whose work is long done but like a coda to an episode still playing out.
You don’t have to be someone who grew up with ”The Twilight Zone,” which was on the air from 1959 to 1964, to have been touched by Serling’s work. Thanks to endless ”Twilight Zone” reruns and voluminous Web and print scholarship, Serling seems more alive now than at the time of his death, at age 50. His surreal vision of the dread beneath everyday life — a critic once likened him to ”a living-room Bertolt Brecht” — has long since become a part of the American subconscious. To be reminded how contemporary he remains, check out ”Number 12 Looks Just Like You,” in which every girl is rendered perfect through mandatory plastic surgery in the impossibly distant year 2000.
Serling, whose writing credits also include scripts like ”Requiem for a Heavyweight” and the original ”Planet of the Apes,” has long been revered in his hometown. But only in the past few months has a local entrepreneur, Michael Weinstein, come up with the plan for a museum (www.rodserlingmuseum.com), which he hopes to open in fall 2007. The Rod Serling Memorial Foundation, in town, is on board, and his widow and others have expressed support, he said.
The plan is to house the museum in a Victorian building next to Mr. Weinstein’s eccentric Bundy Museum, dedicated to the workplace time clocks invented by Willard L. Bundy and to African art. Mr. Weinstein hopes to have exhibits on Serling’s radio and television work and his teaching, and would like eventually to recreate ”Twilight Zone” sets at a third Victorian he owns.
Mr. Weinstein has a long way to go to make this work, but it’s a safe bet that Serling would have approved.
For all his professional success, Serling had a difficult life. He was increasingly alienated from politics and culture and often caught up in a Hollywood life that probably didn’t deliver what it seemed to promise. But he loved Binghamton the way expatriates cling to the old country.
”Everybody has to have a hometown,” he once said. ”Binghamton’s mine. In the strangely brittle, terribly sensitive makeup of a human being, there is a need for a place to hang a hat or a kind of geographical womb to crawl back into, or maybe just a place that’s familiar because that’s where you grew up.”
His most famous homage to Binghamton was an episode called ”Walking Distance.” In it, a man returns to his hometown, where everything, even the carousel, is the same, and he sees himself as a little boy. He’s desperate to rejoin his family and childhood self, but his father, telling him there’s only ”one summer to every customer,” banishes him to the dreary adult present.
AND, in truth, Binghamton would be a hard place for him to return to. It was once so prosperous that even the Great Depression passed by like a glancing gust of foul weather. But most of the factory jobs, lumber and shoe making, defense and cigars are long gone, and the population has dwindled from a high of 85,000 in the mid-1950’s to about 47,000 now.
But then Serling, as ”Walking Distance” shows, probably already knew that. So he tells us at the end that his protagonist is successful at most things, ”but not in the one effort that all men try at some time in their lives: trying to go home again.” He may be seduced some night by the distant music of a calliope and sounds of laughter in the dark and think he can recapture the parks and merry-go-rounds of his youth.
But alas: ”He’ll smile then, too, because he’ll know it is just an errant wish, some wisp of memory, not too important really, some laughing ghosts that cross a man’s mind — that are part of the Twilight Zone.”